This post originally appeared on Medium here
‘All told [American VCs] did not [seem to have] a strong impulsion to transfer a new block of cash to an account in London, Paris or Berlin, to dig in.’
This is the picture left by the talks at TechCrunch Disrupt London last Monday by a panel of SV VCs. Despite the stronger attention that Europe is getting from overseas, there are still no strong interests in transferring operations in Europe and increase their presence in the motherland.
Several investors want to invest in things that they know, in companies they can drive to or fly to in a day, and that is understandable. However the majority of these players are in the end motivated by returns, and a big part of the motivation for not expanding to Europe is that these returns are not worth the effort.
And in the end, companies that truly scale are going to get the US market as well. And are going to pass by their gates at some point.
The large return opportunities reside however in early stage investments. That is when a small investment can lead to great returns and that is why, in my opinion, we should see more transatlantic activity at an early stage. As a consequence, probably low investments are motivated by low returns.
Low returns caused by obstacles to blitzscaling
In the last Stanford class about blitzscaling, Reid Hoffman and John Lilly do an egregious job in showing and discussing the heuristics around startup scaling. Outlining the philosophy of several company stages, and specific challenges and opportunities connected to all of them.
And it makes you think. A startup already has an incredible number of risks. Increasing risks by not knowing what are the practices that others have used in the same situation is wrong and not value optimising for entrepreneurs.
This experience is either scarce or not present in most European startup networks. Which leads startups to repeat the same mistakes and overall not maximising their growth speed.
The first step is knowledge
There is a reason to study history and to have monuments. Human knowledge has the amazing characteristic of being transferable through time. And it allows present generations to not repeat errors that were committed in the past, and basically evolve faster.
The same should be applied to startups. A whole lot of the innovation that we are seeing today has been pioneered and failed at Xerox park in the 60s. The idea of human intelligence augmented by the machine was the main drive to develop software in the early stage of the computer era.
As a consequence, many of the mistakes have been already committed. And knowledge of them is a competitive advantage for your company against competitors or just against failure.
As Patrick Collison (Stripe) said, “knowing history of what has been happening in your sector is way to cheat”, it prevents you from make the same mistakes again.
A European body of startup knowledge
As a European startup that helps other startups in one of the most difficult activities, determining their valuation, we have been thinking a lot about this at Equidam. Determining valuations for companies means truly understanding their risks and potential. And the more we look into our data, and the more we read about these things online, the more we are convinced that the challenges and risks that European startups face are peculiar, unique to their geographies and need unique solution to be resolved.
We of course are not the only ones to think that EU problems need EU solutions. However, maybe because of the ever so European fragmentation, nobody is collecting this knowledge and making it readily available. So we decided we’ll do it.
This post originally appeared on Medium here